|
|
Post by Admin on May 23, 2023 12:42:42 GMT -5
For some offseason content, the Superfan invites everyone to grade CSU (A through F) in the following areas:
Overall level of talent
Size & Athleticism
Scoring ability
Defensive ability
Bench production
Three Point Shooting
The Superfan will go first:
Size & Athleticism: C+
Scoring ability: B-
Defensive ability: B
Bench production: B+
Three Point Shooting: F
Grading should be on a scale of relative to other mid-major teams in similar conferences.
|
|
|
|
Post by azvike83 on May 23, 2023 13:19:57 GMT -5
Overall level of talent: B
Size and Athleticism: B+
Scoring Ability: B-
Defensive Ability: B
Bench Production: B+
Three Point Shooting: C
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 23, 2023 13:31:58 GMT -5
Overall level of talent: B Size and Athleticism: B+ Scoring Ability: B- Defensive Ability: B Bench Production: B+ Three Point Shooting: C Much too generous on the three point shooting. |
|
|
|
Post by azvike83 on May 23, 2023 15:22:00 GMT -5
Overall level of talent: B Size and Athleticism: B+ Scoring Ability: B- Defensive Ability: B Bench Production: B+ Three Point Shooting: C Much too generous on the three point shooting. We are not going off of last year, correct?...we are predicting this coming year...we'll see... I don't think a "C" is too much to ask relative to other mid major schools... |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 24, 2023 10:07:17 GMT -5
The team was #341 out of 363 Division I teams last year in 3 point percentage at 30.6% and they didn't add any three point shooters
|
|
|
|
Post by azvike83 on May 24, 2023 13:20:19 GMT -5
what were they "relative to other mid-majors" as your criteria requires?...can they not improve this year?...its just a harmless prediction. I think if they go up around 3% they will merit a "C" grade...but again, we'll see...
|
|
why4
New Member
Posts: 40
|
Post by why4 on May 25, 2023 11:11:16 GMT -5
For some offseason content, the Superfan invites everyone to grade CSU (A through F) in the following areas: Overall level of talent Size & Athleticism Scoring ability Defensive ability Bench production Three Point Shooting The Superfan will go first: Size & Athleticism: C+ Scoring ability: B- Defensive ability: B Bench production: B+ Three Point Shooting: F Grading should be on a scale of relative to other mid-major teams in similar conferences. I think you also have to look at the offense being run last year. With DP, they didn’t really get out and run so there were almost no points in transition, and literally NO transition 3’s even attempted. Conversely, in the half court set, how many near shot clock violation 3s or threes from almost 30 feet did they take last year? If the offense is in attack mode and people are waiting for them at the rim, why aren’t they kicking it out for open 3’s? If you look at the good looks vs the hurried or “panicked” looks up against the shot clock, I bet the percentages are much higher. Lowder and Woodrich both were shooting over 35% early and faded later in the season. The offense needs to be tweaked so they’re applying pressure to the defense more. You can’t run it down to 4 seconds and expect a miracle every time. |
|
|
|
Post by gbanks on May 26, 2023 15:12:07 GMT -5
Exactly.. On good day, the Vikes fielded 4 Isaac Okoro(s) and 1 Chedi Osman on offense.
|
|
