|
|
Post by vikesfan on Nov 14, 2023 10:46:39 GMT -5
Starting with Ken Pom as NET is not yet released…
CSU - 149
WSU - 162
NKU - 203
YSU - 211
MKE - 218
OAK - 229
PFW - 234
RMU - 276
IUPUI - 305
UDM - 319
GB - 351
|
|
|
|
Post by vikesfan on Nov 22, 2023 8:08:46 GMT -5
Updated 11.22…
Oak - 159
WSU - 160
CSU - 162
PFW - 195
YSU - 213
NKU - 220
RMU - 259
MKE - 271
UDM - 316
GB - 342
IUPUI - 346
|
|
|
|
Post by vikesfan on Nov 27, 2023 13:00:39 GMT -5
Updated 11/27…
WSU - 130
OAK - 147
CSU - 155
PFW - 197
YSU - 203
NKU - 222
RMU - 271
MKE - 284
UDM - 318
GB - 324
IUPUI - 343
So far, seems like biggest overachievers are OAK and PFW. Biggest underachiever is MKE.
For our schedule so far and upcoming, Ken Pom rankings look like…
DUQ - 80
OU - 112
CAN - 212
EMU - 291
ETSU - 248
AA&M - 354
11/29 YSU - 203
12/2 UDM - 318
12/5 SMC - 59
12/9 KSU - 119
12/15 Bradley - 77
12/21 WMU - 274
So far, best win against OU. Best loss against Duquesne. Worst win vs. ETSU. Worst loss vs. EMU.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 27, 2023 14:11:50 GMT -5
Our worst win would be Alabama A&M at number 354 haha. Or Defiance non D1
|
|
|
|
Post by vikesfan on Nov 27, 2023 16:06:44 GMT -5
Our worst win would be Alabama A&M at number 354 haha. Or Defiance non D1 Yeah, guess I was thinking about the fashion in which we won. Barely got by ETSU vs. blowing Defiance and A&M out. |
|
|
|
Post by mrhoops on Nov 27, 2023 20:43:55 GMT -5
Oakland just took down Kenpom #32 Xavier on the road. The Grizzlies T. Thompson is legit. The Grizzies should be a player in the HL, good athletic team. Always hated playing up there.
|
|
|
|
Post by vikesfan on Nov 27, 2023 20:46:16 GMT -5
Oakland just took down Kenpom #32 Xavier on the road. The Grizzlies T. Thompson is legit. The Grizzies should be a player in the HL, good athletic team. Always hated playing up there. Great win for the conference. Will help Oakland a ton in Ken Pom and NET which strengthens everyone’s schedule with an opp to take Oakland down. |
|
|
|
Post by mmurph46 on Nov 28, 2023 1:24:08 GMT -5
St. Mary's lost another one tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 4, 2023 9:26:29 GMT -5
The first NCAA NET ratings were just released. CSU women are number 89. CSU men are number 191. The problem still exists that the bottom of the Horizon League is really really bad. 4 Horizon League teams on the men's side are rated worse than 300. This conference just never improves ever. The more things change the more they stay the same. More than one third of the conference ranked worse than 300. Trash
|
|
|
|
Post by frankiemeatballs on Dec 5, 2023 5:54:37 GMT -5
The first NCAA NET ratings were just released. CSU women are number 89. CSU men are number 191. The problem still exists that the bottom of the Horizon League is really really bad. 4 Horizon League teams on the men's side are rated worse than 300. This conference just never improves ever. The more things change the more they stay the same. More than one third of the conference ranked worse than 300. Trash Circling back on your “playing down to the competition” comment and folks counting the ETSU win in the “bad performance” category, ETSU is 2 spots behind us at 193. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 5, 2023 10:09:12 GMT -5
Yeah - at the time I thought CSU may have been around 140th-150th best in the country. Clearly wasn't the case. We may not be a top 200 team when all is said and done. Which is shocking given that we returned 65% of scoring from last year and added decent players. To me that comes down to a coaching failure. Of course still two thirds of the season to go, but rom what I've seen this isn't a top 200 team.
|
|
|
|
Post by frankiemeatballs on Dec 5, 2023 20:47:49 GMT -5
Yeah - at the time I thought CSU may have been around 140th-150th best in the country. Clearly wasn't the case. We may not be a top 200 team when all is said and done. Which is shocking given that we returned 65% of scoring from last year and added decent players. To me that comes down to a coaching failure. Of course still two thirds of the season to go, but rom what I've seen this isn't a top 200 team. You apparently haven’t learned anything from last season. |
|
|
|
Post by user1 on Dec 6, 2023 1:04:31 GMT -5
Yeah - at the time I thought CSU may have been around 140th-150th best in the country. Clearly wasn't the case. We may not be a top 200 team when all is said and done. Which is shocking given that we returned 65% of scoring from last year and added decent players. To me that comes down to a coaching failure. Of course still two thirds of the season to go, but rom what I've seen this isn't a top 200 team. You apparently haven’t learned anything from last season. You're asking too much out of Durda. CSU Superfan jumps on and off the bandwagon on a min by min basis. |
|
